Turn exact-version feedback into a new branch.
Keep feedback attached to a specific saved version.
Start creating in Chat ↗Ask for feedback on the version people will see
Illustrative announcement: the reviewer comments on the selected document revision, even if a newer draft exists later.
Set the review boundary
Choose an eligible saved artifact and inspect the exact version before opening focused review. The review grant exposes the selected item, not the entire private workspace.
Continue from one comment
Read feedback on that revision, then open it in the workspace. An authorized editor can prepare a private branch with the reviewed source and comment ready for a new request.
Feedback is a starting point, not an overwrite
The comment stays attached to its reviewed version. The branch creates another path; earlier drafts remain available. See focused review and branching from an exact result.
See an example workflow
An illustrative example. Review current inputs, settings and the quote in your workspace.
- StartSelect an eligible announcement revision for focused guest review.
- Request or actionRead a comment, then branch privately from that exact revision.
- ReviewConfirm the branch uses the reviewed source and comment.
- Saved resultA separate revised document; the comment remains on the original.
- ContinueCompare both drafts and choose.
Example AskGL request
Shorten the opening of the reviewed announcement while keeping its approved event date and venue.
Replace sample facts with approved details. Source selection and later review, comparison or packaging happen in the workspace, outside the prompt text.
Continue the workflow
Good to know.
Creation notes
Prepare your starting point
Read the comment with its exact reviewed source available and decide what the next candidate should improve. An authorized editor prepares the private branch. Inspect that the intended revision and relevant context are used; a guest review grant does not give general private workspace access.
Creative reviewReview what you keep
Compare the whole next output with the original and the suggestion that motivated it. Check that the requested change did not lose approved facts or useful visual details. Keep the comment on its original target as context for accepting or rejecting the new direction.
Feedback-to-revision storiesCommon questions
Does this decision require an AI prompt?
Use the comparison, selection, review or branch controls for the decision itself. A subsequent generation is a separate request with its own sources and quote.
Does this expose the entire workspace?
Private permissions remain in effect. A guest review grant or selected delivery is bounded to its intended material, rather than general access to unrelated work.